T he latest entrant in what is growing to become a crowded field of supersonic aircraft promises airplanes which will fly faster than Concorde — and at $5,000.00 each way between New York and London; $6,500.00 between San Francisco and Tokyo; and $7,000.00 between Los Angeles and Sydney, which are the current prices of some business class tickets for transoceanic flights — supersonic travel will purportedly be more affordable than Concorde.
Affordable Supersonic Travel? Boom!
Billed as the fastest passenger airplane ever, Boom claims at its official Internet web site that supersonic travel will become a reality: in addition to advanced design software and wind tunnel tests, “This isn’t science fiction — it’s possible now with today’s aerodynamics, carbon fiber composites, and the latest engine technology.”
The prototype aircraft — currently being built in a hangar in Denver by a “dream team” of twelve people comprised of experienced engineers, pilots, and hands-on builders who are grounded in physics and pushing technology to new heights by making key contributions to 30 new aircraft and conducted test flights to Mach 3 — will supposedly fly late next year with test flights at Centennial Airport south of Denver; and supersonic test flights near Edwards Air Force Base in California.
Boom is supposedly a misnomer for the name of the company, as the aircraft is not only expected to be significantly quieter than Concorde and its sonic boom; but it is also expected to be up to 30 percent more fuel efficient than Concorde.
At Mach 2.2 or 1,451 miles per hour, the aircraft developed by Boom is expected to be faster than Concorde, which flew at Mach 2.0; and 2.6 times faster than a typical airplane which travels at a speed of Mach 0.85.
Blake Scholl — who is the founder and chief executive officer of Boom; as well a a pilot and former executive at Amazon — believes that affordable supersonic flights could potentially become a $100 billion market due to so much pent-up demand for faster international travel; and that the airplane could potentially fly on 500 different routes. A partnership has already been established with Richard Branson and Virgin Group — of which he is the founder and chief executive officer — where an option was signed to purchase ten of the airplanes.
…and this does not even include the assorted futuristic technologies about to which I referred in this article where you could travel from New York to Beijing in as few as two hours; or this article pertaining to possibly one day traveling from London to New York in approximately one hour; or this article where passengers can be transported between Toronto and Montréal in as few as 30 minutes with Hyperloop technology.
“Just as we’re all now flying around in our gyrocopters (according to POPULAR MECHANICS when I was a boy in the 50s) I will certainly look forward to commuting between Toronto and Montreal in less time than it takes me to walk from my condo to Union Station. Considering the capital cost of these projects, let alone proving the science, and the fact that we can’t even face up to the cost of replacing the lead water pipes in most cities, pardon me if I toss this one in the trash along with dozens of other lame, speculative concepts.”
That was the reaction posted by reader DavidB had towards the aforementioned technology which will purportedly transport passengers between Toronto and Montréal in as few as 30 minutes…
…and members of FlyerTalk seem to have a similarly skeptical reaction overall to the aircraft being developed by Boom. For example, FlyerTalk member BlackSkyukdoes not believe it: “Only $5000 return, don’t believe that.” FlyerTalk member enjoyingitposted “Just cant see it happening. Never mind that the numbers don’t add up, and not even close, until someone finds a way of eradicating the sonic boom, there wont be any commercial supersonic flight. Shame.” FlyerTalk member Dean Cooperfield_Westquestioned that “There is more chance of a Titanic II or the original Concorde flying again. Why spend $5000 on this when you can get an ex-EU fare in first for less than that?”
Declaring that “That is the worst name for an airline” in referring to the name Boom, FlyerTalk member t325posted that “I’d be afraid that mentioning the airline’s name within earshot of a TSA agent is going to get me in trouble.”
Although I flew as a passenger on Concorde — I intend to post a retroactive trip report on my experience — I would like to be a passenger aboard either this aircraft or its potential competitors during flights…
…but Concorde supposedly failed because tickets were expensive — as well as maintaining the fleet of aging aircraft.
Supersonic travel is still “vaporware” at this point; but one can hope that it will return in some form — and hopefully, more affordably…