Recording Police: Do You Have the Right?

D o you have the right to record police with video, audio or photographs while they are performing their duties — especially in a public place?

According to an article written by T.C. Sottek at The Verge, you not only absolutely have the right — but perhaps also the duty — to do so in the United States.

An unarmed black teenager named Michael Brown was reportedly shot and killed by a police officer on August 9, 2014 in Ferguson, which is a suburb of St. Louis. Since then, the town has been overcome by protests and civil unrest as a result of increased tension between police and the citizens of Ferguson.

Earlier this week, a line of police officers of St. Louis County supposedly demanded that a crowd of protesters turn off their cameras, according to Sottek. “Here’s the deal: as a resident of the US, you have the right to record the police in the course of their public duties. The police don’t have a right to stop you as long as you’re not interfering with their work. They also don’t have a right to confiscate your phone or camera, or delete its contents, just because you were recording them.

“Despite some state laws that make it illegal to record others without their consent, federal courts have held consistently that citizens have a First Amendment right to record the police as they perform their official duties in public.”

What does this have to do with travel, you might ask?

For years, there has been confusion as to whether or not photography is allowed at airport security checkpoints. The following policy is directly from the official Internet web site of the Transportation Security Administration:

“TSA does not prohibit the public, passengers or press from photographing, videotaping or filming at security checkpoints, as long as the screening process is not interfered with or slowed down. We do ask you to not film or take pictures of the monitors. While the TSA does not prohibit photographs at screening locations, local laws, state statutes, or local ordinances might.

“Taking photographs may also prompt airport police or a TSA official to ask what your purpose is. It is recommended that you use the Talk To TSA program on to contact the Customer Support Manager at the airport to determine its specific policy. Or, if you are a member of the press, you should contact the TSA Office of Public Affairs.”

There have been incidents in the past where confusion reigns as to whether the policy of the airport supersedes the policy of the Transportation Security Administration — or vice versa:

Andrea Abbott attempted to record the “pat-down” of her daughter at an airport security checkpoint on her mobile telephone back in 2011; but an officer of the Nashville International Airport Department of Public Safety appeared to purposely use his body to block her line of sight to her daughter.

FlyerTalk member marklyon alleged that he was assaulted by a Transportation Security Administration agent for filming the security checkpoints inside Terminal 4 at John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York three years ago where he attempted to determine which security checkpoints were using the Backscatter advanced imaging technology machines, and then he was ultimately forced to delete the footage — part of which he has successfully recovered and is available for viewing:

Would Phil Mocek have been found by a jury not guilty of all four charges levied against him in 2011 in what has been considered a landmark case pertaining to the rights of passengers when traveling — specifically, not showing his identification when asked at an airport security checkpoint in Albuquerque — had he not recorded a video of the incident?

Here is the video, if you cannot see it below:

Last year, United States District Judge James O. Browning dismissed Transportation Security Administration agents as defendants from a civil lawsuit filed by Mocek, as the Transportation Security Administration agents were entitled to dismissal because Mocek had reportedly not demonstrated to the satisfaction of the federal judge violations of the First Amendment when he was ordered by them to cease filming.

From the department of the absurd: what if you were threatened by a flight attendant to delete photographs you took of your feet aboard an airplane? What if a flight attendant ran up to a Transportation Security Administration, or TSA, agent at customs upon arrival and reported you for taking photography, implying that you did so in the terminal area even though you did no such thing?

As I believe in the rights afforded to American citizens as provided by the Constitution, it would be no surprise that I support the recording of law enforcement officers and agents of the Transportation Security Administration by any means necessary as they performed their duties — but I want to emphasize the word necessary, as I do not believe that the recordings should be done superfluously or in a manner purposely designed to intentionally annoy the person or people in question being recorded…

…but I also believe that the recorder should not be harassed by the law enforcement officers or agents of the Transportation Security Administration whom they may be recording, as it is within the rights of that person to do so.

It would be a rather dark day in the United States if the police in Ferguson had it their way and were allowed to prohibit the recording of them actively on duty by whatever means they deemed necessary — especially if by force — in my opinion; and it would be equally detrimental to travelers if a similar policy was allowed at airport security checkpoints in the United States.

Photograph courtesy of Phil Mocek.

  1. Some years ago, I wanted to take a photograph of gate board showing my Continental EWR-BHX 9 hour delayed (4am) depature. The pic incident had two staff in the pic. I was told by the staff not to take the pic because it was a security threat. I replied it was not at all but a credibility threat to CO she was protecting. Still I did not take the pic. Could I have taken that picture under the 1st Ammendment?

    1. I am not a legal expert nor knowledgeable of constitutional law — and someone please correct me if I am wrong — but the staff members of an airline are entitled to their privacy, just as you would be entitled to your privacy.

      If someone were to approach you to purposely take your photograph, you have a right to refuse — or, you at least have a right to ask why your photograph was being taken. For example, you would be entitled to compensation if your likeness was used for commercial purposes — such as in an advertisement to sell clothing or food; and if it was done without your permission, you might also be entitled to monetary damages.

      The First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States, however, includes freedom of the press, which actually applies to this article where representatives of a government — in this case, the police or the Transportation Security Administration — cannot prohibit or interfere with the reporting of events or the expression of opinions unless under the guise of the danger of compromising national security.

      Could you have taken the same photograph without the two employees, Levy Flight?

      1. You only have a right to privacy in a place where you have a reasonable expectation of privacy. If you are standing outside and someone wants to take your picture they can. You are correct that someone cannot use your likeness for commercial purposes, but anyone can take anyone else’s picture if they are out in public.

  2. Thanks for response, Brian. It had not been my intent to include the staff in the pic but they were standing in front of the board and I clumsily marched right up with my camera when the delay flipped from 6 to 9 hours. They made it clear that they did not want the pic taken. I thought of waiting til they moved of but they seemed at the time to be making a point of standing by the board. i am still wondering if I just take that pic if they refuse to move in an attempt to prevent me taking it. They little battles when everyone is hanging around 9 hours longer than they all want.

    1. I probably would have just said to them that I wanted to take a photograph to record the delay and that when they had a chance, could they please step aside for a moment so that I may take the picture.

      My experience is that gate agents are usually accommodating when I am nice to them and treat them with respect — and I am not suggesting at all that you were not nice and respectful, Levy Flight.

      I am sorry that you had to experience a delay of nine hours. That must have been agony…

  3. sorry i didn’t understand the conclusion yet. so as a Citizen, are we legally allowed to take pics and vids of on-duty security personnel (e.g., Police, TSA etc) without their permission?

  4. Get a life. I’m gonna record you all day. Police have enough to deal with. They don’t need a camera shoved in their face. Half the things they do you as a non police officer would not know why and think is wrong.

  5. Some US citizens (not only working at the airport) seem to have forgotten what it means to live in the land of the free. This makes me feel sad.

    You are free as long as you wear a t-shirt with your the printed, support the VETs and are patriotic.

    Please, read aboves sentence again this time not thinking about the US but thinking about North Korea for example.

    Beeing free is wearing a t-shirt you like, not having to support anybody you do not intend to, not having to prove to anybody if you are patriotic or not. So, whenever a citizen wants to be recognized as a FREE citizen, some US citizens seems to be failing in understanding this.

    If you “endanger” the so called security (even by taking a picture at the gate) you are not a patriot. If you are not a patriot you have troubles.

    No! This is not freedom and this is not the land of the free!

Your email address will not be published.

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates from our team.

You have Successfully Subscribed!