Road Warrior Training at Delta Air Lines
Photograph ©2013 by Brian Cohen.

Should Airlines Share Their No-Fly Lists With Other Airlines?

Delta Air Lines has already shared greater than 600 names with the Federal Aviation Administration of the United States.

No fewer than two senior vice presidents at Delta Air Lines sent memorandums to members of their teams in which they announced that the names of greater than 600 people who were banned from flying as passengers with the airline were submitted to the Federal Aviation Administration of the United States in 2021 as part of its Special Emphasis Enforcement Program — which was first issued on Wednesday, March 17, 2021 — in response to recent incidents which involved unruly passengers.

Should Airlines Share Their No-Fly Lists With Other Airlines?

“At Delta, we now have more than 1,600 people on our ‘no fly’ list,” Kristen Manion Taylor — who is the senior vice president of in-flight service at Delta Air Lines — said, according to this article from Delta News Hub. “We’ve also asked other airlines to share their “no fly” list to further protect airline employees across the industry — something we know is top of mind for employees as well. A list of banned customers doesn’t work as well if that customer can fly with another airline.”

In addition, Eric Phillips — who is the senior vice president of airport customer service and cargo operations at Delta Air Lines — said, “Let me be clear that any unruly customer behavior, and harmful actions against our team members, will not be tolerated. Anytime a customer physically engages with intent to harm, whether in a lobby, at a gate or onboard, they are added to our permanent No Fly list. We also actively engage with local authorities to ensure these incidents are investigated and prosecuted as the law allows. In addition, we actively support any impacted team members and provide them with resources to help them in the aftermath of an incident.”

The rate of unruly passenger incidents aboard the airplanes of commercial airlines during flights has decreased sharply since the Federal Aviation Administration of the United States launched its Zero Tolerance campaign toward unruly passengers back in January 2021 — but apparently not sharply enough.

“As of last week, unruly passenger incidents were occurring approximately six times per every 10,000 flights. That’s an approximately 50 percent drop from early 2021, but it’s more than twice as high as the end of 2020”, according to this official press release from the Federal Aviation Administration. “Since the FAA launched its public awareness campaign with memes and two public service announcements, the rate has fallen approximately 30 percent.”

As a result, the Federal Aviation Administration has urged airlines to take stronger action with passengers who are unruly, belligerent, and disruptive.

“A new national survey of nearly 5,000 flight attendants released today by the Association of Flight Attendants-CWA, AFL-CIO (AFA) found that over 85 percent of all respondents had dealt with unruly passengers as air travel picked up in the first half of 2021. More than half (58%) had experienced at least five incidents this year. A shocking 17 percent reported experiencing a physical incident”, according to this official press release from the Association of Flight Attendants. “AFA is calling on the FAA and DOJ to protect passengers and crew from disruptive, and verbally and physically abusive travelers. Survey data confirmed that existing measures were failing to address the problem. 71 percent of Flight Attendants who filed incident reports with airline management received no follow-up and a majority did not observe efforts to address the rise in unruly passengers by their employers.”

Road Warrior Training at Delta Air Lines
Photograph ©2013 by Brian Cohen.

Flight attendants are trained to defend themselves against unruly passengers and even fight back, if necessary. The photograph shown at the top of this article — as well as the one directly above this paragraph — was taken at the world headquarters of Delta Air Lines in Atlanta in a room where flight attendants practice on dummy passengers to learn how to defend themselves as part of their rigorous training.

Final Boarding Call

I have mixed thoughts about this initiative: while I absolutely believe that passengers who are unreasonably disruptive — such as intentionally causing physical harm on anyone else who is aboard an airplane during a flight — should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law and likely deserve to be on a “no-fly” list, it also potentially opens the door towards the rare occurrence of a rogue member of the flight crew who may be in a bad mood to unjustly insist that a passenger who may be contradictory in behavior be placed on a “no-fly” list as well.

Also, what is the duration of time on which the name of someone remains on a “no-fly” list? Is the duration of time indefinite, with no chance of ever flying as a passenger aboard an airplane ever again for the remainder of his or her life?

That Delta Air Lines submitted only less than 38 percent of the total number of names of people who are officially on its “no-fly” list suggests to me that there are indeed different levels of not being allowed to fly; and that those greater than 600 names are of people who committed the most egregious of acts of unruly behavior. If a passenger slits the throat of another person aboard an airplane — as an example of a blatantly egregious act — that person should probably be banned from flying as a passenger aboard an airplane for the remainder of his or her life…

…but if a passenger has a complaint and the member of a flight crew is having a bad day and decides to punish that person, that passenger should be given another chance at some point.

Of course, those two examples are at completely opposite ends of the spectrum, with varying acts of unruly behavior in between…

All photographs ©2013 by Brian Cohen.

  1. First – there is really no excuse to be violent, physical, or generally unruly on a plane (or anywhere, really). Shameful.

    BUT…I am quite confused by the numbers quoted: The FAA says .06% of passengers are unruly (6 incidents per 10,000 flights) but FA claim 17% are physical with them?! I would think that all physical altercations are unruly. So… how are .06% unruly but 17% are physical? It seems the FA are seriously reaching in their complaints here – which could explain why only 29% of their claims are taken seriously by their employers.

    People are super testy these days. And in the videos of in-flight altercations I have seen, the FA are often just as nasty and combative as the ridiculous passengers. I do expect better restraint from the FA as they are trained and paid to do so.

    As for the banned unruly list – I think it is a stretch. If this is a list of people who brought weapons on a plane with intent to harm then, yes, share the list. That is a true safety issue. If this is a list of people who were at one time or another, intoxicated or agitated or in a bad mood and displayed this poor behavior on a flight, that should be treated as a one-off bad situation and not reason to restrict them forever or on other airlines.

    I can not imagine personally ever doing anything on a plane that would warrant this type of rebuff. But to held accountable for one relatively minor situation forever and in every situation is ridiculous.

    1. 17% of respondents reported experiencing a physical altercation. The summary in the article doesn’t cover *what* a physical altercation is. Is having some dude all up in your face a “physical altercation” or is it only when physically touched?

      Regardless, the 17% figure isn’t 17% of flights had a physical altercation, it’s 17% of those who took the survey experienced one in X period.

  2. 17% and 6/10,000 flights are consistent with each other. If a FA flies 200 flights per year, that is 2,000 flights per decade. 2,000 flights per decade among 5 FAs is 10,000. If 1 FA got into a fight, that would be 20%. There are 6/10,000 instead of 1,000.

    The professionalism of a FA is less than that of a pilot or doctor. I do not trust FAs to have sufficient professionalism to have a shared no fly list. Instead, altercations should be prosecuted with fines or prison, not lifetime no fly list based on a FA’s report. Even a police officer cannot enact a lifetime ban based on one police officer’s report.

  3. Not a comment on the content, but rather on the format: I’m using the Firefox browser on a PC, and that combination makes the typeface (font) in this blog post very small and difficult to read.

    1. I always appreciate comments and suggestions such as yours as to how to improve the reading experience at The Gate, Miles. Thank you.

      The type size has been increased. Please let me know if it is better for reading.

  4. If someone is a threat on one airline they are a threat on any airline.

    I’m not sure that I’m in agreement that refusing to wear a mask warrants being on a no fly list.

Your email address will not be published.

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates from our team.

You have Successfully Subscribed!