Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut and Edward J. Markey of Massachusetts can keep dreaming — and here are the reasons why eliminating baggage fees will not reduce long lines.
Ancillary Fees are Too Profitable for Airlines
Despite domestic airfares supposedly being at their lowest cost in five years, ancillary fees — especially fees to check baggage — have brought billions of dollars worth of revenue to airlines based in the United States. Suspending the charging of fees to check baggage during the summer months could mean a loss of at least two billion dollars — and most likely more — to the airlines.
I may not support the charging of ancillary fees; but the airlines would be crazy to voluntarily give up that revenue. Ancillary fees arguably are what saved the remaining existing airlines from financial disaster.
Who Wants to Check Baggage, Anyway?!?
Remember the “old days” when anyone could check their baggage free of charge? That option was not popular then — even when it was included in the price of an airline ticket — due to luggage being lost; or having your belongings appearing last on the conveyor belt at the baggage claim area of the airport.
Still — with all of that revenue derived by airlines from fees to check baggage — someone is paying them; but I still do not believe that there would be any significant impact in the mitigation of long lines at airport security checkpoints, because…
I do not place all of the blame on those passengers. Some of them simply do not know any better, as they travel infrequently — and that is not meant to be an insult. If agents of the Transportation Security Administration better maintained the integrity of the lines to ensure that all passengers pass through as quickly as possible, long lines would not be nearly as frequent an occurrence at airport security checkpoints, in my opinion.
Missed flights by passengers due to long lines at airport security checkpoints is unacceptable, resulting in lost time and money in general — and despite the well-intentioned efforts of Blumenthal and Markey, the suspension of fees by airlines to check baggage is not the answer, in my opinion.
I believe that all lanes of an airport security checkpoint should operate similarly to the Pre✓ program from the Transportation Security Administration — perhaps with the exception of one or two lanes reserved for neophytes of air travel, where friendly agents will assist to ensure that those passengers are processed with as little anxiety as possible — and passengers should not have to pay extra money for the privilege of being processed as quickly as possible, as they already pay through taxes charged on their airline tickets. Simplify the rules and policies without sacrificing security in terms of processing passengers at airport security checkpoints.
Follow those simple common-sense recommendations, and more agents of the Transportation Security Administration do not need to be hired while passengers simultaneously spend significantly less time at airport security checkpoints — all without costing extra money.
In other words, Peter Neffenger — who is the current administrator of the Transportation Security Administration of the United States: run your agency and the airport security checkpoints under its purview more efficiently…
…and instead of bothering the traveling public and lawmakers with the problems of your agency; perhaps you and your staff should solve them.
Katrina Callin reviews the identification of a passenger at one of the checkpoints at Baltimore/Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport. Source: Transportation Security Administration.